The smart Trick of ejusdem generis case laws That No One is Discussing

The smart Trick of ejusdem generis case laws That No One is Discussing

Blog Article

9 . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair into the offender along with the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts However they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The plenty of this power casts an obligation within the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a good amount of this power casts an obligation to the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the uncovered counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues of your matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession from the subjected premises towards the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided by the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this aspect for interim custody of the subject premises If your petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

If the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had an opportunity to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is generally only performed Should the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence as well as the petitioner company responded to the allegations as such they were well aware about the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to generally be looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more

This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding arrived at because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your summary or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court may interfere with the summary or even the finding and mould the relief to make it correct on the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or the nature of punishment. Over the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified via the decision on the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more

Since the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been achieved, therefore the decision on the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) with the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice on the Peace u/s 22-A is just not obliged to afford a possibility of hearing on the accused party; nor obliged to essentially or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is required to take into consideration all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal regulation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a number of the relevant factors. Read more

However it can be made obvious that police is free to take action against any person that is indulged in criminal activities issue to regulation. However no harassment shall be caused on the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of legislation. Police more info shall also guarantee regard on the family lose in accordance with law and whenever they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they are able to act, as far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall secure concrete evidence and procure necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate like a issue of security of your house is concerned, which is not really public place under the Act 1977. nine. Thinking about the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition continues to be reached. Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of during the terms stated earlier mentioned. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads forty Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

10. Without touching the merits on the case of your issue of annual increases inside the pensionary emoluments with the petitioner, in terms of policy decision on the provincial government, these types of once-a-year increase, if permissible in the case of employees of KMC, needs further assessment to generally be made from the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance as a consequence of funding issues and lack of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, requiring the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more

The legislation of necessity regarded and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it absolutely was the illegal action called legislation of necessity..

In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative from the legislation laid down through the Supreme Court while in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Hence, the competent authority of the parent department in the petitioner plus the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount in the petitioner and pay back the pension amount and other ancillary benefits to the petitioner to which He's entitled under the legislation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority of the respondent is additionally directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits from the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more

Problems or Errors If you encounter any technical problems with this website (for instance a terrible link or possibly a portion of an opinion missing), please notify the eService Center.

17 . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have listened to the acquired counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues from the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) of the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession on the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to become decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court should see this component for interim custody of the subject premises In the event the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Read more

Therefore, this petition is found to be not maintainable and is also dismissed along with the pending application(s), and also the petitioners may possibly look for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more